bgniom.blogg.se

Dxo denoise
Dxo denoise











dxo denoise

).ĭid you see the extreme test for DeepPRIME XD? It ended up generating grid/dot-pattern artifact, perhaps the model was tweaked to be extra-sensitive to details. Perhaps I feel normal because nind-denoise has set the bar for me, and I'm familiar with AI/neural-network (been playing with Stable Diffusion, YOLOv4. It's just a matter of time and effort in creating samples data for training and tweaking the parameters for the models, AI denoisers will only get better. What dxo pl6 does with a single hit is to my eyes game changing, period. Not only does dxo enhance details, it does the ai nr thing and sharpening in one hit, including reducing the purple blotches which also seems to plague these 40mp aps-c sensors. Most AI denosers work at RAW level to maximize the data it can infer from, even nind-denoise works only on RAW. You can add nd grads and lots of other local adjustments but if you need more, layers you will need to export as a dng or a tiff and on my pc, its a matter of 10 seconds with the deep prime, or around 20-30 for the more intensive xd, which is really only necessary for higher iso's, above iso1600 to be fair. Then it adds the shadow correction if you wantĪll in all its as pure a result as you could ever need. Then you can apply the native camera simulation taken or the neutral camera specific or a selection of emulations. Then its applies the lens compensation, no usm required Its not a tool I will purchase again, its not cheap either.Īs soon as you click the prime details tab it does its xtrans demosaic work in seconds, its the equivalent, except better imo, of Lr enhance details tool. I just find Topaz adds all sort of artifacts and random things into any of their conversions. The raw version is more effective, but unfortunately it's a lousy raw developer."

dxo denoise

"Topaz DeNoise AI and Photo AI can be used on raw or RGB images, but use different models for each.

dxo denoise

I havn't used the commercial tools, but in the thread that I linked, Digital Nigel explained: The difference is dxo is doing all at raw level, anyone who has used topaz will no in many instances it does more harm than good, there's all sorts of issues.













Dxo denoise